SISO Foundry
Owns scalable source discovery, candidate comparison, fingerprints, reuse intelligence, and publication-safe candidate export. It never creates accepted Library Works automatically.
Evidence-gated intake · preservation first · generated public queue
This program continuously turns useful local agent mechanisms into owned, sanitized, verified, released, Library-indexed, and stack-pinned capabilities. It exists to preserve proven work without turning every interesting folder into a repository.
SISO already has valuable agent infrastructure distributed across released Works, source warehouses, operating workspaces, experiments, and host configuration. The gap is not invention. The gap is a dependable metabolism that can recognize value, establish evidence and ownership, extract the reusable mechanism, and finish publication without leaking private state or duplicating an existing Work.
working local mechanism → read and evidenced → classified and assigned → sanitized and extracted → tested and released → Great Library Work/Release → selected Snapshot → pinned Agent Stack component
Owns scalable source discovery, candidate comparison, fingerprints, reuse intelligence, and publication-safe candidate export. It never creates accepted Library Works automatically.
Owns Source Inventory intake, evidence and rights review, stable Work identity, immutable Release evidence, Snapshot selection, and the public promotion projection.
Hooks, Skills, Playbook, Runtime, Project OS, Agent Zero, Brain, Session Intelligence, Integrations, or another evidenced Work owns extraction, implementation, tests, and release cadence.
Pins verified component releases into a reproducible installation. It does not absorb component identities or install promotion candidates.
| Stage | Meaning | Required evidence to advance |
|---|---|---|
unverified | A proxy or nomination only. | No consequential verdict or mutation is allowed. |
read | The relevant source was read; the capability and uncertainty are described. | Dated source-review evidence and a preservation boundary. |
candidate | Reusable value is plausible and does not duplicate a released mechanism as observed. | Content-based comparison, privacy and ownership risks named. |
owner_assigned | An existing Work or justified new boundary owns the outcome. | Resolvable target Work and a concrete next gate. |
extracted | Portable source has been separated from private state and host assumptions. | Clean source boundary, provenance, license, and fixtures. |
verified | The owning repository proves the behavior. | Relevant tests, negative cases, installation checks, and independent verification. |
released | An exact public source commit and immutable Release Manifest exist. | Commit-scoped artifact and distribution evidence. |
library_indexed | The released capability is represented by its owning Work and selected Snapshot. | Schema-valid registry changes and full Library verification. |
stack_pinned | The Agent Stack installs the exact verified release where appropriate. | A Stack Release carrying the exact manifest as a SHA-256-verified artifact, a component revision bound to the owning Release, Snapshot selection, and clean-install evidence. |
retired | The candidate is explicitly closed without erasing its decision history. | Content-based reason and, when applicable, a successor reference. |
A promotion stage is not a distribution claim. Only a Release Manifest can claim that source is downloadable, resolvable, installable, forkable, or portable.
unverified.Priority is a scheduling decision, not a truth score. Reviewers consider:
Does the mechanism improve real agent outcomes, and is there evidence of a current consumer?
Can policy be separated from host, provider, personal paths, credentials, and topology?
Are claims supported by direct source reads, executable checks, public commits, or dated receipts?
Does an existing Work already own the behavior? Is this a skill, hook, playbook, adapter, package, application, or genuinely independent Work?
Are ownership, license, privacy, client boundaries, and publication rights explicit?
The accepted promotion queue is a dated immutable Source Inventory with publication-safe logical source scopes. Every unit records its classification, intended disposition, product-owner state and target Work IDs, evidence-owner Work IDs when ownership is unassigned, promotion stage, priority, confidence, portability, next gate, blockers, rationale, and dated evidence. An unassigned product owner cannot carry a target Work link or reach owner_assigned; this lets Foundry own candidate evidence without accidentally owning the future product. Raw laptop scans and private receipts remain outside the public repository.
The generated Promotion page and /promotion.json are projections over accepted inventory data. They never scan a contributor's machine during a Library build and never write Work, Release, Assembly, or Snapshot records automatically.
Large GitHub storage headroom is useful for durable public source, immutable commit archives, releases, fixtures, and independently owned Works. It is not a reason to shard one system into thousands of repositories. Repository creation is earned by a coherent outcome, an owner, independent adoption, a release lifecycle, and a verification surface. Bulk data, generated corpora, operational databases, and private state remain behind explicit storage boundaries rather than being disguised as source repositories.
A campaign iteration is complete only when its accepted inventory is schema-valid, publication-safe, visible in the generated promotion surfaces, and accompanied by an exact next gate for every open unit. A promoted capability is complete only when its owning release, successor Snapshot, Stack decision, verification, deployment, and live receipt are recorded.
Registry model · Using the Library · Current promotion queue