{ "generated_at": "2026-08-02T19:10:00.000Z", "base_path": "/", "schema_version": "1.0.0", "snapshot_id": "gls:snapshot:8d4f2a91-7c53-4e6b-a0d8-1f92b6c4e8a7", "snapshot_version": "36.0.0", "infrastructure_contract_url": "/docs/god-questions-infrastructure.html", "counts": { "questions": 7, "programmed_questions": 3, "assumptions": 7, "evidence_connections": 10, "challenge_edges": 2, "action_learning_links": 8, "public_answers_released": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 19002 }, "questions": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:2ac84615-3f9d-4040-95d6-9d9f39e4dc84", "question_id": "GQ-001", "slug": "frontier-question-agent-workspace", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-agent-workspace/", "question": "How should the complete agent workspace be designed across code layout, agent architecture, memory, enforcement, and agent-generated user interfaces?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "current", "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01", "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one cold reconstruction task against the typed workspace boundary and compare errors, intervention, and elapsed time with the prior evidence path.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "public agent-workspace repositories", "code-layout and architectural enforcement", "memory and context systems", "agent-facing interface patterns" ], "answer_shape": "Evidence-graded principles, reference architectures, rejected patterns, and tests that distinguish universal findings from SISO preferences.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a major agent platform, workspace architecture, or failed forward prediction changes a load-bearing conclusion.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:0212a6f4-1860-453b-bb27-2e9ed70a09c4", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.0.0+ea7f0e4", "released_at": "2026-08-02T02:08:28+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one cold reconstruction task against the typed workspace boundary and compare errors, intervention, and elapsed time with the prior evidence path.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES", "level": "QA", "scope": "agent-workspace architecture", "statement": "A complete agent workspace can integrate its organs through typed interfaces without collapsing their independent ownership boundaries.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "Representative workspace tasks require one organ to own another organ's durable state, evidence adjudication, and runtime authority to remain coherent.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ001-RESEARCH-METHOD" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY", "level": "QA", "scope": "workspace reconstruction", "statement": "Stable identities, typed relationships, and explicit receipts reduce the context a cold agent must reconstruct before useful work.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "Cold-task comparisons show no meaningful reduction in reconstruction time, errors, or human intervention after adding the addressable contract.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ001-LIBRARY-SEED" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ001-RESEARCH-METHOD", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/question-driven-research.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "The published organ and assumption boundaries provide a reusable frame for evaluating complete workspace architectures.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-001.json#evidence", "revision_or_digest": "registry-record:2026-08-01", "summary": "The question-driven research architecture separates identity, discovery, corpus, evidence transformation, and execution responsibilities.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ001-LIBRARY-SEED", "source_type": "release_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "registry/releases/frontier-question-gq-001-seed.json", "relevance_hypothesis": "The existing metadata seed tests whether a question can remain addressable while its partial answer stays unpublished.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "source-review:frontier-question-intake:gq-001:2026-08-01", "revision_or_digest": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "summary": "The immutable seed exposes publication-safe identity and scope without presenting the partial answer as a public artifact.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ001-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-001.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:34:00+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES", "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The current question frame defines learning demand but grants no implementation or budget authority." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 2, "evidence_connections": 2, "action_learning_links": 1, "serialized_program_bytes": 3425 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:e38b054f-b926-4410-b84d-4fd3249fd4f4", "question_id": "GQ-002", "slug": "frontier-question-agent-layer-efficiency", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-agent-layer-efficiency/", "question": "What changes would make the complete provider-neutral SISO agent layer ten times more effective per unit of time, attention, and compute?", "research_state": "answered", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "current", "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01", "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one paired agent task with and without the evidence-aware context and receipt path, including retrieval and repair overhead in the comparison.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "public agent harnesses and orchestration systems", "released SISO Agent Stack components", "privacy-safe operational measurements", "memory, routing, budget, and handoff mechanisms" ], "answer_shape": "A ranked leverage map whose recommendations each carry measurements, external analogues, an experiment, and a falsifiable success threshold.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer after material stack changes or when new measurements overturn the current bottleneck model.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:b95eeca5-ed9d-48ac-858c-f6d62065cd29", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.0.0+ea7f0e4", "released_at": "2026-08-02T02:08:29+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one paired agent task with and without the evidence-aware context and receipt path, including retrieval and repair overhead in the comparison.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "evidence-aware agent context", "statement": "Evidence-aware context improves representative agent-task outcomes enough to justify its retrieval and authoring overhead.", "status": "active", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Paired representative tasks show no material correctness, intervention, reconstruction, or cost improvement after repair overhead is included.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ002-OPERATING-PLAN" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "agent outcome reconstruction", "statement": "Privacy-safe causal lineage and observation receipts make routing and capability decisions more reconstructable than untyped session summaries.", "status": "active", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Independent reviewers cannot reproduce a routing or promotion decision more reliably from typed receipts than from the existing evidence path.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ002-SEED-REVIEW" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ002-OPERATING-PLAN", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/100-million-token-operating-plan.html#operating-loop", "relevance_hypothesis": "The published operating loop supplies falsifiable context and lineage pilots for testing agent-layer efficiency.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "docs/100-million-token-operating-plan.html#canonical-contracts", "revision_or_digest": "accepted-direction:2026-08-02", "summary": "The operating plan connects question demand, evidence, reversible experiments, measured outcomes, and returned learning without assigning truth to runtimes.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ002-SEED-REVIEW", "source_type": "source_review", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "reference": "source-review:frontier-question-intake:gq-002:2026-08-01", "relevance_hypothesis": "The intake review tests whether operational research can remain owner-held while a public question exposes only safe lineage.", "rights_state": "owner_held", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-002.json#evidence", "revision_or_digest": "source-review:2026-08-01", "summary": "The public Work records that operational evidence and the existing answer remain unpublished rather than copying sensitive measurements.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ002-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-002.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:34:00+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE", "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The public frame requests evidence about agent-layer leverage while private measurements and execution authority remain owner-held." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 2, "evidence_connections": 2, "action_learning_links": 1, "serialized_program_bytes": 3478 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:85964f1c-2efe-48b0-8f71-dc32bb668c0c", "question_id": "GQ-004", "slug": "frontier-question-best-software-primitive", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-best-software-primitive/", "question": "For a named software primitive, which implementation is best for the stated context, and is it safe and valuable to reuse, vendor, or learn from?", "research_state": "scoped", "lifecycle_status": "experimental", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "corpus", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "Foundry capability category selected by the requested primitive", "implementation and interface evidence", "maintenance, adoption, security, and license evidence", "counter-examples across language and scale" ], "answer_shape": "A context-specific ranked shortlist with interface fit, evidence grade, rights gate, adoption cost, and explicit reasons not to choose each candidate.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when the category gains a high-signal implementation, a selected project materially changes, or security and rights evidence changes.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:037ad734-0cc3-4afb-9dc0-c2b55f1dcee7", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:32:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:7782f923-d44e-4a47-8ce6-134e31816673", "question_id": "GQ-005", "slug": "frontier-question-field-momentum", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-field-momentum/", "question": "Which categories, techniques, and projects are gaining real momentum, what mechanisms explain the change, and what does the acceleration predict next?", "research_state": "scoped", "lifecycle_status": "experimental", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "corpus", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "frozen Foundry momentum snapshots", "category and capability movement", "release and adoption signals", "counter-signals that separate durable emergence from short-lived attention" ], "answer_shape": "A ranked movement map with observed deltas, causal hypotheses, confidence, leading indicators, and dated predictions that can later be scored.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer on a fixed cadence and whenever a leading indicator crosses a pre-registered materiality threshold.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:1ee81aa0-42cc-4bcd-a87b-4f34baf9cc13", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:33:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:2144e900-4886-461e-92f1-49571f2e9f74", "question_id": "GQ-006", "slug": "frontier-question-information-organ", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-information-organ/", "question": "How should the information organ continuously gather, preserve, query, and push valuable evidence into authorized agent workflows and self-improvement loops?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "public source-acquisition and retrieval systems", "Library Research Works and their public contracts", "privacy-safe health and freshness evidence", "feedback-to-learning mechanisms" ], "answer_shape": "A verified operating architecture with explicit ownership, freshness contracts, query primitives, feedback loops, failure modes, and observed end-to-end receipts.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a source lane, retrieval contract, or learning loop materially changes or fails its freshness guarantee.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:8225da3f-9a19-45d8-880e-0f2539756c0f", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:34:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:3b4c4fa6-31f2-4cfc-9542-00f32e200621", "question_id": "GQ-008", "slug": "frontier-question-model-routing", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-model-routing/", "question": "Which available model should own each recurring work shape after quality, reliability, tool use, latency, quota, and cost are evaluated together?", "research_state": "answered", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": null, "success_criteria": [], "falsifiers": [], "evidence_gaps": [], "watch_triggers": [], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "current public benchmark suites", "first-party provider documentation", "privacy-safe real-task outcomes", "quota, latency, and cost constraints" ], "answer_shape": "A versioned scenario-by-model routing matrix plus a machine-readable table, evidence grade per cell, and explicit re-evaluation triggers.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a tracked model, benchmark, price, quota, or material real-world task result changes.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:a5e56fcf-e19d-4ead-8c7d-9660d41ed47e", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:35:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:3e220d53-cd95-4e28-922e-5018e808ee92", "question_id": "GQ-009", "slug": "frontier-question-god-questions-infrastructure", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-god-questions-infrastructure/", "question": "How should the Great Library make God Questions visible, composable, continuously updated, and connected to evidence, decisions, approved action, and capability learning without becoming the corpus warehouse or execution runtime?", "research_state": "researching", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "current", "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-08-16", "as_of": "2026-08-03" }, "next_useful_work": "Measure whether cold readers can reproduce the public estate dispositions without private context, then route one independently adjudicated runtime receipt before expanding the action bridge.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Which registry fields, Library projections, evidence interfaces, and action-return contracts should become the standard infrastructure for every SISO God Question?", "success_criteria": [ "A cold human or agent can find every standing question, its state, decision target, evidence gaps, falsifiers, watch triggers, and current answer lineage from one generated Library surface.", "Existing repositories, books, videos, research, and operational receipts can attach to a question through owned evidence systems without being copied into the public registry.", "A question can justify a bounded action candidate and later receive a verified learning return without the Library authorizing or executing the action.", "At least one repeated mechanism discovered through a question can be evaluated and promoted into its independently owned capability Work." ], "falsifiers": [ "The design requires a second question registry or central operational database to remain coherent.", "The visible dossier accumulates metadata but cannot improve a real research, routing, or investment decision.", "Useful evidence cannot be connected without leaking private corpora, machine paths, client data, or operational topology into the public Library.", "Maintaining the question contract costs more attention than the repeated research and decision errors it prevents." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "No evaluated end-to-end user flow yet proves that the portfolio view helps a cold operator choose the next valuable investigation.", "Claim, contradiction, assumption, experiment, mandate, observation, and learning-return objects do not yet share one proven cross-system receipt contract.", "No three-question cohort yet measures authoring overhead, evidence reuse, decision impact, or capability promotion rate." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A new God Question cannot express a decision target, falsifier, evidence gap, or refresh condition in the current contract.", "Foundry or Knowledge ships a question-addressable export that can replace a manual evidence link.", "The first approved experiment returns an Observation Receipt and exposes a missing Library lineage field.", "Three heterogeneous questions complete a full research-to-decision loop and justify stabilizing or deleting provisional fields." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "gls:work:2fa08dac-937a-44d3-a547-f16ac28c4e25", "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_scopes": [ "the existing Frontier Question Works, metadata seeds, answer-lineage model, and question-driven research architecture", "the generated Research index and individual Question Work reading surfaces", "publication-safe Foundry, Knowledge, Evidence Engine, Event, ADR, Release, and Snapshot interfaces", "privacy-safe receipts from real research, routing, repository, book, and implementation work" ], "answer_shape": "A versioned God Questions operating architecture with a generated Observatory, machine-readable question-program contract, evidence and action-return interfaces, ownership boundaries, acceptance fixtures, and explicit promotion and kill gates.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a real question cannot use the contract, a source or action interface changes, three-question evaluation evidence lands, or measured operating overhead exceeds the value created.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:df8a236d-b092-4d51-9e17-d1016671db64", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.1.0+0066cfa", "released_at": "2026-08-02T05:13:21+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-08-16" }, "next_useful_work": "Measure whether cold readers can reproduce the public estate dispositions without private context, then route one independently adjudicated runtime receipt before expanding the action bridge.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "level": "QA", "scope": "Library identity and projection", "statement": "The existing Work, Release, Snapshot, and Event spine can support question-program visibility without a second registry.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "A heterogeneous question cannot express and validate its current program or answer lineage without a separate source of identity truth.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-CONSTITUTION", "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "EC-GQ009-OPERATOR-PASS", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "question reconstruction economics", "statement": "A compact assumption, evidence, and action-learning projection improves cold-reader reconstruction enough to justify its authoring overhead.", "status": "challenged", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Cold readers or agents cannot reconstruct a decision path more accurately, or the repeated authoring cost exceeds the errors and rediscovery avoided.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY", "level": "QA", "scope": "action and learning authority", "statement": "Typed public references can connect question demand to returned learning without granting approval, execution, or evidence-adjudication authority to the Library.", "status": "challenged", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "A real action-to-learning chain cannot remain reconstructable unless the Library stores private payloads or represents a proposal as approval or observation as accepted truth.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-JOINT-BRIDGE", "EC-GQ009-PRIVACY-FAIL", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ009-CONSTITUTION", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/god-questions-infrastructure.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "The canonical constitution exposes the minimum identity, ownership, interface, dependency, and falsification rules the substrate must implement.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "https://github.com/Lordsisodia/great-library-of-siso/commit/270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "revision_or_digest": "270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "summary": "The pushed constitution preserves question identity, organ boundaries, action authority, learning proposals, and explicit later or rejected scope.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "source_type": "repository", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/Lordsisodia/great-library-of-siso/commit/270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "relevance_hypothesis": "The verified document checkpoint tests whether the existing generator can expose a canonical question-infrastructure reader without a second registry.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "repo-check:god-questions-infrastructure:270c37c", "revision_or_digest": "270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "summary": "The exact branch checkpoint passed the complete Library gate and published the authored and generated constitution plus Research navigation.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE" ] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-JOINT-BRIDGE", "source_type": "registry_record", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "reference": "registry/events/2026-08-02-god-questions-infrastructure-program-started.json#evidence", "relevance_hypothesis": "The start Event's public bridge evidence tests whether action and learning ownership can be referenced without copying its owner-held design payload.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "workspace-handoff:glos-100m-frontier-joint-lineage-20260801", "revision_or_digest": "event-evidence:2026-08-02", "summary": "The public Event records the typed, approval-gated bridge while the Library remains limited to safe identity and lineage.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-OPERATOR-PASS", "source_type": "operational_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/Lordsisodia/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "relevance_hypothesis": "Independent cold-reader and contract replay test whether the canonical projection improves reconstruction and remains backward compatible.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "verification-receipt:sha256:7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "revision_or_digest": "68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "summary": "Independent cold-reader and contract lanes reconstructed the operator path and verified canonical human and agent projections at the exact pushed checkpoint.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-PRIVACY-FAIL", "source_type": "operational_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/Lordsisodia/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "relevance_hypothesis": "The independent privacy adversary tests whether typed public metadata actually prevents owner-held text, topology, credential, timing, or truth-state leakage.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "verification-receipt:sha256:7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "revision_or_digest": "68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "summary": "The privacy lane found that free-text metadata and temporal or truth-state edges needed stronger validation; the mixed receipt is verified observation, not accepted truth.", "supports_assumption_ids": [], "challenges_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION", "source_type": "source_review", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/estate-reconciliation.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "A reviewed public candidate cohort tests whether existing Library identities and explicit no-change or deferral outcomes can absorb estate learning without a second registry or automatic promotion.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "owner-review-receipt:sha256:9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "revision_or_digest": "9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "summary": "Four public repository observations resolved to two existing Work links, one historical no-change result, and one owner and license-review deferral; no source or registry identity was automatically promoted.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ009-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-009.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:33:07+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "GQ-009 defines the decision, falsifiers, evidence gaps, and expected answer without authorizing implementation." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-CANDIDATE", "object_type": "action_candidate", "authority_state": "proposal_only", "owner_role": "operating_architecture", "reference": "gls:event:43f26801-1225-4650-90eb-7a1362760f8d", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:33:08+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-DEMAND" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The active initiative is represented as a bounded action candidate; approval and execution receipts remain separately owned." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-MANDATE", "object_type": "execution_mandate", "authority_state": "approved_scope", "owner_role": "decision_owner", "reference": "authorization-receipt:sha256:dc93428fcc4624a54d3e341ce87a7c3a31a10288510a63726d2644789bfccdd3", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:31:58+07:00", "content_sha256": "dc93428fcc4624a54d3e341ce87a7c3a31a10288510a63726d2644789bfccdd3", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-CANDIDATE" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "approved", "expires_at": "2026-08-02T07:31:58+07:00", "summary": "Shaan approved a six-hour bounded infrastructure, verification, and closeout envelope; the private authorization payload remains owner-held and only its digest is public." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION", "object_type": "observation_receipt", "authority_state": "observation_only", "owner_role": "independent_verifier", "reference": "https://github.com/Lordsisodia/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:58:30+07:00", "content_sha256": "7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-MANDATE" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "verified", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "The mixed independent observation passed cold-reader and contract reconstruction but failed privacy hardening, producing a bounded repair requirement rather than an accepted answer." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-LEARNING", "object_type": "learning_return", "authority_state": "learning_proposal", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "learning-return-receipt:sha256:dd48a2a2b541175ea0a239131545a521c95caf6d268201fdf5b8a5fe7389de65", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:59:30+07:00", "content_sha256": "dd48a2a2b541175ea0a239131545a521c95caf6d268201fdf5b8a5fe7389de65", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "no_change", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "The Learning Return proposes the privacy and temporal repairs now under verification while keeping GQ-009 researching, publishing no Answer Release, and promoting no capability." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-ESTATE-LEARNING", "object_type": "learning_return", "authority_state": "learning_proposal", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "learning-return-receipt:sha256:9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T05:07:20+07:00", "content_sha256": "9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "no_change", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "Owner-reviewed estate reconciliation supports the existing identity and authority boundaries, records no new Work or inventory, keeps the deferred candidate outside promotion, and proposes no Answer Release." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 3, "evidence_connections": 6, "action_learning_links": 6, "serialized_program_bytes": 12099 } } ] }